Who Do You Think Is Better Graves Or Danzig.Who Ever You Think Is Better,Type It On This Discussion

lol

Zoli did do pretty good with them. I was not expecting that. Ignite has no sound like the Misfits, so I was worried.

this is ridiculous . both are amazing but to compare the two ? there both very different. i guess it depends who you ask. the younger generation seems to go for michale more while the older generation like me......... im only 31 which isnt old but the age range from teen to say ? mid 20's like michale more. i listened to my first misfits cd legacy of brutality when i was 15 and fell in love with danzig's music. i seeked out everything by him. you cant realy compare there work on the misfits. danzig's songs on the misfits were not all based on horror. all the michale (misfits) songs had that comic book feel to it. you realy cant compare the 2. im a huge fan of both but danzig wins by............... a whole lot

i liked danzig and the misfits growing up in the mid 80's and dedicated all my time and money in my early years buying everything misfits and danzig was the shit!!!when i heard they were getting together again without danzig,it killed me to think of the fits with someone else,i bought american psycho for novelty reasons,just to add the cd to my collection thinking it would be horrable,then i started the transition to liking michale better,they broke up,then i followed him into the graves band era ,bought web of d and got it sighned too,on to gotham rd,on to solo,and ever since then its been mike!!!!!!!!!!!!fingers are tired now

I think Jerry just wants his voice heard now.

have any of you ever asked your self the question ? would we ever know who michale graves was if jerry hadnt discovered him ? i bet there are other talented people out there who will never be given a oppurtunity

good point alot of the horror punk bands try way too hard to have that danzig sound

I prefer danzig when it comes to the misfits, because i like his style back then alot more then graves. but post misfits latley depends on my mood. Today id say danzig, tomarrow probably graves. I think if graves and danzig were not such great singers people would be more happy with jerry's vocals, I myself like him on project 1950, but hate his live vocals. oh, and graves is way better live then danzig because graves keeps the mic next to his mouth, danzig cant keep it next to his face so you cant always hear what he's singing.

michale is so talented and original that theres a great chance he would have blown up without jerry,but jerry happened to discover him,right place and time,then again he might still be unknown,some of the best music in the world will never be discovered

when you ask who is better with the misfits i could not pick one its just to close,if you ask who is the man now after misfits i have to go with graves im just not feellin glenns latest stuff its good but not great like mikes,back in the 90s danzig 1 2 3 and 4 where some great recordings but after those i have not been very impressed

Glenn's music legacy is spanning over 30 years from his days in the Misfits to his Danzig material. He has been a key catalyst in what we call today as horror music, as he has influenced alot of people. I used to make fun of Glenn and think he was a total joke, but that soon changed after his music grew on me and now I can't get enough of his music. Everything from Danzig I, Circle of Snakes, Blackacidevil, Walk Among Us to November Coming Fire.

Mike on the other hand is also amazing. He was in the resurrected Misfits for only 5 or so years and he's only showed progress since his departure, while everyone else in the band seems to have gone astray of their true path of musicianship. He's showed us that he can sing punk, metal and ofcourse acoustic and only impress us with his constant flow of new material. It's been a decade since he left the Misfits, and he's written more material than any of the former Misfits members. I can only wait in anticipation for his next release.

I say they are both amazing musicians in their own ways. If you want experience, obviously Glenn would win because of how long he's been in the business. Mike on the other hand in a music prodigy thats overflowing with originality and uniqueness.

Hey, I laughed too. Goofy topic. Lots of responses though. I wonder if the OP (thats you MichaleGraves138) has anything to add? Don't let your thread die without knowing it's own father/mother!

This question again?
Heres what ill say
Theres no comparison there both very talented creative intellectual people
If your referring to who was the better frontman for the misfits id say and lots would agree that graves had SO much more energy and presence onstage then glen

I think both of them suck.

haha

I'd say Michale just cos the first time I heard the misfits was with Danzig and I didnt think much to it, then later on I heard misfits with michale and thought it was amazing, i now love the danzig era but as it didnt make an ampression first time round its definately Michale for the win, as for Jerry I would love a new misfits record with him singing if its purely original tracks with the horror punk theme, I liked his voice on project 1950 n day the earth caught fire.

how about having dez sing some tracks for the new album, would just be nice for a few more cds to be added to my collection

Im a fan of both but in my opinion Danzig cannot be beat for stage presence, people who say mike has more energy and presence onstage need to watch some of the earth AD era perfomaces. Glenn was so intense, jumping into the crowd and screaming his lungs out and totally tearing shit up. Theres a live video of them doing wolfsblood live and...well...just check that out and say glenn didnt have equal or more energy than mike onstage. Im not not trying to take anything away from mike, after all i wouldnt be on this forum if i wasnt a fan but glenn takes it hands down.

In terms of vocal style thats just personal opinion. they are both good and both very different. personaly i prefer glenn but mike does some stuff better than glenn and the other way round. I still think mike must be one of the only people that could have replaced glenn.

Jerry only on the other hand sounds like a 50 year old dude who is constantly getting kicked in the scrotum.

Who is better? I dont think I understand the question!

Its sounds like one of those 'my dad is bigger than your dad' discussions.

graves vs danzig?? i think danzig would win cos of all the weights he's been lifting, quite built, graves looks kinda small, but graves has speed on his side.

hahaha

Graves. no contest, danzig is a d-bag. even my 57yr old father like Graves more. age has nothin to do with it.

I don't think that Mike's much taller than Glenn

glenn is like 5'4. and judging by the times ive talked to graves, he's alittle higher than my shoulder.. so hes about 5'8 maybe?